FuqHR is an AI resume builder for people applying to a specific job. You paste the posting, and it rewrites your CV against that description, scores the result on the criteria applicant tracking systems weigh, and gives you a matching cover letter to send with it.
This started with one of us on the wrong side of it.
Stefan Preradovic works in marketing. For a year he chased a full-time role, sending hundreds of applications a month and spending his days at his father’s construction company. The freelance work never stopped coming. The applications never landed.
Somewhere in that year he stopped believing the problem was him.
He’d never written a line of code. He got an AI to write him a Python script that rebuilt his CV anyway. It was a mess. He also kept count: his reply rate went up 17%.
That’s one of us measuring his own tool over one year, not a study, and we’re not going to dress it up as one. It was enough.
He brought it to the other Stefan — Ninic, his best friend, best man at his wedding, and the one who could build it properly. Two founders, both called Stefan. We’ve stopped trying to explain it.
It means what you think it means.
Applying for a job now means sending your history into systems that never explain themselves. You’re ranked by software whose criteria nobody publishes, filtered by rules you can’t see, and told nothing either way. Hundreds of applications a month for a year will make anyone want to name their company something rude.
What it doesn’t mean is faking anything. We don’t invent skills, pad experience, or inflate a score. What we’re actually angry about is narrower and more insulting: people who can genuinely do the job get filtered out because their CV describes it in the wrong words. The experience is real. The system just can’t see it.
So that’s what FuqHR does. It takes what you’ve actually done and makes it legible to the thing standing between you and a human being — the same experience, in the language the software reads. Then it shows you the score and every criterion behind it, which is the part they’ll never do for you.
You have probably read that around three quarters of resumes are thrown out by bots before a human sees them. That figure has been traced back and does not hold up. It gets repeated because it sells things — usually to the people most anxious about their job search.
What is true is narrower and more useful. Applicant tracking systems mostly rank and filter; they rarely reject outright. The one mechanism that does reject automatically is the knockout question — a required degree, a minimum number of years, work authorisation. So we report those separately and never fold them into your score, because they are pass/fail in a way a number is not.
We are also straight about the limits of the score itself. No major applicant tracking system publishes how it weighs a resume, so any vendor claiming to replicate one is guessing. Our weights are a documented estimate, tuned against the only publicly described model in the industry, and we show you every sub-score rather than a single mysterious grade. The number is guidance for a human deciding what to fix next — never a gate, and never a promise.
If you are sending the same resume to twenty postings, this is not for you. It is built for tailoring to one job at a time.
Where the gap between your history and the posting is the whole problem, seeing which criterion is weakest is more useful than a generic template.
You get the score, the sub-scores, and the specific changes that would move them — before you send anything.
Resume tools get described interchangeably. Here is what we deliberately do not do.
FuqHR is free while it is in beta — no paid plan, no trial countdown, no card. We would rather find out what people actually need from it before deciding what to charge for. More on pricing.
Template to tailored kit in minutes — see for yourself.
Build my resume